El pes econòmic de la remença i dels mals usos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/aem.1992.v22.1067Abstract
The purpose of this work is to contribute to divulge the reasons of the conflict that implies the redemption, studying its effects through the analysis of the economic charges that the above mentioned tax, serfdom rights and other constraints supposed for the peasantry who was to pay them. We talk about the origin of serfdom rights, about their establishment on the peasantry in the farms, about the impact of the «Sentencia de Guadalupe» -that does not only affect serves, but also other farmers- about legal casuistry, about who was to pay them, which was the amount and in what proportion it was payed. We also tackle the lack of effectiveness of the right of mishandle. We can thus conclude that apart from the intestates and in some cases, few though, from the redemption, serfdom rights only overburdened the poorest farmers, because well-off farmers were only hindered in their possibilities of economic improvement by the obstacle that represented the prohibition to abandon the farm, which was an obstacle for the land market and which prevented profitable marriages.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.